Sunday, April 26, 2015

A634.5.4.RB_DiazBrian



Most organizations are in the business of making money.  One of the most important contributing factors to the success of an organization is how well they market their goods and services to their customers.  Customers have to believe that these good and services are a necessity which they must have.  Marketers are tasked with being in position to persuade potential customers (or clients) to buy said goods and services.  Do marketers have our best interests in mind?  Are they ethical in their approach to obtaining new customers?  El Sayed and El Ghazaly (n.d.) wrote “Some argue that promotional advertising, which is a main player in the marketing function, tends to manipulate consumers all the time” (para. 5).

My personal belief is that money is the driving force and life’s blood for most companies.  For example, in my organization there is currently a hiring freeze.  The reason for the hiring freeze is because enrollments are down campus wide for the academic year.  Enrollments have impacted the amount of revenue that was projected.  The deficit has made it necessary for leadership to scale back expenditures.  This means our yearly retreat will more than likely be cancelled, raises will be less than hoped for, and any special projects that were in the works may need to be shelved.  These factors can potentially influence how marketers attempt to connect with future students.  “Ethical problems in marketing stem from conflicts and disagreements. Each party in a marketing transaction brings a set of expectations regarding how the business relationship will exist and how transactions should be conducted. Each facet of marketing has ethical danger points” (“Issues in Marketing,” 2014).

Companies should not ignore their core values and beliefs if they wish to achieve balance in ethics.  They should have a sense of commitment to their community, employees, corporate culture, and most importantly, their customers.  “Ethical balance is the implementation of ethical standards through solid moral values without being consumed by those standards. Ethical balance creates a compromise between company interest and customer interest” (“Achieving Ethical,” n.d.)I think sometimes companies lose focus of the consumer because they are so fixated on profits.  It is great to have financial goals but it is unrealistic to believe that every product, service, or goods is going to be a financial success.  If organizations can focus on their customers, to truly make their experience with the organization one that is memorable, more than likely they will create a customer for life.

Technology has made tracking of our spending, search engine browsing history, and even our physical location available to third parties.  Namely marketers.  Take your smart phone for instance.  I own an iPhone.  I try to be aware as much as possible of all of the capabilities of my phone.  All of my apps have a location services capability.  I have to manually deny access to my location for these apps.  That I was aware of.  What I was not aware of was that my phone tracks my location as well.  There is a frequent locations functionality in the location services of my phone which tracks where I go.  And I thought “big brother” was the only one watching.  If anyone wanted to know where I have been on a regular basis they would have easy access to that information if they got a hold of my phone.  For example, a parent could easily know whether or not their child was actually in school on a certain day if they wanted to.  All they would need to do would be to look at their child’s phone.  A spouse who suspects their partner of questionable activity could also easily access their location information.  Is it any more ethical for someone you know to learn about the different aspects of your habits than for marketers to have this information?  I for one do not have an issue with marketers tracking me.  I benefit by receiving notifications when there are sales, discounts, or specials for products I might use.  There are several ways to privately browse the internet http://www.cnet.com/how-to/five-smart-ways-to-keep-your-browsing-private/  I see it as a choice that can be made.  While I am certain 100% of information cannot be kept completely confidential, there are ways to minimize your exposure to unwanted marketing.

El Sayed and El Ghazaly (n.d.) wrote “The definition of marketing according to the Wikipedia website states that; ‘Marketing is a societal process which discerns consumers' wants, focusing on a product or service to fulfill those wants, and attempting to move the consumers toward the products or services offered’" (para. 1).  As a leader I will use organizational culture to guide marketing.  By aligning company values and beliefs and translating those to my employees, I can inspire them to be honest, empathetic, and caring of our customers.  Regardless of the product or service.  My goal will be to value the customer and to always remember how important they are to our success.  By espousing these beliefs I can make my organization successful and our customers happy.


El Sayed, H., & El Ghazaly, I. (n.d.). Ethics-Based Marketing: Ethical Articles. Retrieved from http://www.ethicsbasedmarketing.net/2.html



Sunday, April 19, 2015

A634.4.4.RB_DiazBrian



Discrimination can be defined as the “treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person or thing based on the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit” (Discrimination, 2015).  If we look at the definition of affirmative action we will find it is defined as “the encouragement of increased representation of women and minority-group members, especially in employment” (Affirmative Action, 2015).

Based on these definitions, wouldn’t affirmative action be considered as a type of discrimination?  Those who object to affirmative action make the following arguments: (1) affirmative action is reverse discrimination.  Affirmative action (2) hurts white applicants, who (3) are often more qualified.  It additionally can be argued that affirmative action stigmatizes blacks.  Some argue that (5) the practice of affirmative action deprives employers their right to hire whoever they want (LaFollette, 2007).

Recently major corporations such as Google and Facebook came under scrutiny for failing to incorporate diversity in their workforce.  At Google it was found that “Just 1% of its tech staff are black. Two percent are Hispanic. The one well-represented minority group is Asians, who make up 34% of the company's tech workers. Eighty-three percent of Google's tech workers internationally are male.  For non-tech jobs, the number is 52%” (“Tech: Where the,” 2014).  What can we derive from these statistics?  Are blacks and Hispanics not pursuing tech jobs?  How is it possible that only 13% of Googles workforce is represented by women?  This disparity has seemed to be a wakeup call for organizations as they begin to be put under the microscope.  Facebook has not fared any better to represent minorities and women.  Guynn (2014) wrote “The lopsided numbers are just the latest from a major Silicon Valley company to paint a stark picture of an industry sector dominated by white men and are sure to escalate an already heated debate over the lack of diversity in the tech industry” (para. 2).  With all of the recent attention on these two companies, it will be interesting to see what stance they take on affirmative action.  Obviously with the amount of scrutiny both organizations are under I imagine that they are beginning to feel pressure from outside of their organizations to be more equally represented.  What moral implications do Google and Facebook face if they continue on with their current hiring trends?  Is it ethical for others to pressure these companies to hire more minorities and women simply because they are not represented?  It can be argued that maybe these classes are not as qualified to work in these positions.

In my opinion there should not be affirmative action.  If you are underqualified and undereducated then you should not be given something simply because of the color of your skin or your gender.  For example is it stereotypical to say that Asians are more inclined to be efficient in technological jobs or does the data support that more Asian pursue these fields?  I do not hear an outcry from NHL fans for more black players to play.  Is it because the NHL is against minorities or is it because not enough African Americans play hockey?  If you look at the active starting NBA rosters how many white player do you find?  Not many.  It is not because there are not enough good white players, it just so happens that the majority of really talented basketball players happen to be black.  Is there an outcry or call for support for more white players to play in the NBA?  Not the last time I checked.  I think that organizations would be immoral to exclude certain groups of races or gender.  However if they are simply hiring the most talented individuals then I cannot fault them for that.

  
Discrimination. (2015). Retrieved from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/discrimination

Guynn, J. (2014). Status update: Facebook not so diverse. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2014/06/25/facebook-diversity/11369019/

LaFollette, H. (2007). The Practice of Ethics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Weise, E. (2014). Tech: Where the women and minorities aren't. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2014/05/29/silicon-valley-tech-diversity-hiring-women-minorities/9735713/





Sunday, April 12, 2015

A634.3.5.RB_DiazBrian



I’ve always wanted to develop into a responsible respected leader.  I have always strived to be a better person because I believe each of us has the opportunity to make a mark in this world.  We have the ability to make impressions on others.  As much as I want to be successful, I cannot imagine doing it at any cost.  Kramer (2003) wrote “Moving up the ranks can be like competing in a high-stakes tournament: As you make it through successive rounds, the pool of worthy candidates narrows, the margin for error is much smaller, and the competition intensifies. This winnowing process means just a handful of people will attain prominence or success. In some contests—such as those for CEO of a major corporation, head of a mainstream motion picture studio, dean of an elite law school, or president of the United States—there can be only one winner” (para. 9).  This type of mentality can bring out the worst in people.  For example, look at political races.  Each side might take underhanded cheap shots at the other person in an attempt to smear their opponent.  These types of campaigns are enough to make voters not want to choose either candidate.  They say that politics is an ugly business… but should it be?  When we have presidential elections what is more important?  The character of the candidate or whether or not they smoked pot as a teenager?  Winning becomes so important that we lose sight of our own ethics and values.  We lose sight of our goals.


It is unfortunate that some think that in order to get ahead it is necessary to shortcuts.  Taking shortcuts is like admitting failure.  It can also be a reaction to fear.  Leadership is not meant to be easy.  It is also okay to be afraid.  In order to be successful you have to be committed to giving your best effort.  By taking shortcuts there is no guarantee that you will achieve the results you were seeking.   We should all dream to achieve great things.  I think sometimes we lose sight of our dreams and become sidetracked by everyday life (Waldschmidt, 2010).  


When I finally decided to get my head out of my backside and be a responsible adult (after I met my wife, coincidentally) I had to do a self-examination of what I wanted out of life.  I could be an average person with average dreams or I could dedicate myself to becoming a better person and eventually a husband and a provider.  I had worked for many years waiting tables.  It came easy to me because I have the ability to relate well with others.  However, I knew that I could not count on waiting tables to buy my first home, put children through college, or provide stability for my family.  So I decided to return to school and get my degree.  I chose law to pursue.  And if I was going to pursue law as my career I decided I was going to be a lawyer.  That was my goal, that was my dream.  I worked hard at school to maintain a 4.0 CGPA so I could apply to the best law schools possible.  I wasn’t looking to be #1 but I wanted to be as close to #1 as possible.  It was pretty cut-throat in my undergrad.  Students would go to any length to get their teachers to write them a letter of recommendation into some of these law schools.  In order to get myself into law school I wasn’t about to take any shortcuts.  I would just try to be the best I could be.  As it turned out, my dream changed and so did my ambition to go to law school.  But that is another story for another time.

Rules have a place in our lives.  Without them we cannot hold ourselves or others to any type of standards.   As leaders we must promote rules and abide by them ourselves at all times.  People who choose to ignore rules send the wrong messages to others.  Kramer (2003) wrote “Unfortunately, this disdain for the rules puts risk-taking leaders on a very slippery slope. They may consider themselves exempt from the rules that govern other people’s behavior. Even more dangerous, leaders who want it all and who break the rules to get it often develop contempt for those who do play by the rules” (para. 18). 

With success comes sacrifice.  Think about all of the sacrifices made by the CEO or President of your organization.  The time spent away from their families, the birthdays missed, and the soccer games you weren’t able to attend.  Success does not equate to winning.  It just means you are willing to work that much harder than the next person.  It is what you choose to do with your success to make others better and to prepare them to become better that should be used to measure how successful we are.  It can be lonely at the top, and like the old saying goes “be careful what you wish for”.

Kramer, R. (2003). The Harder They Fall. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2003/10/the-harder-they-fall

Waldschmidt, D. (2010). 4 Reasons You Can't Shortcut Your Way to Success - Dan Waldschmidt: Author of EDGY Conversations. Retrieved from http://danwaldschmidt.com/2010/02/business/4-reasons-you-cant-shortcut-your-way-to-success